Charged with a crime in Maryland? Act immediately — early intervention matters.  Call 410-332-0414 now.
Maryland Criminal Defense · Theft

Theft Charges in Maryland:
Value determines the charge. Defense determines the outcome.

Maryland theft law consolidates what were historically separate offenses — larceny, embezzlement, false pretenses, and shoplifting — into a unified theft statute. The value of the property taken determines the classification and maximum penalty. The defense analysis focuses on intent, identity, and the State's evidence.

30+Years Maryland Courts
10Super Lawyers Awards
91+AVVO Reviews
7Counties Served
Home Practice Areas Criminal Defense Theft Charges Maryland

Maryland Theft Law — The Unified Statute

Maryland's theft law is codified at Criminal Law Article §7-104. It defines theft broadly as the unauthorized taking or control of another's property with intent to deprive the owner of the property. This unified definition encompasses traditional larceny, shoplifting, embezzlement, theft by deception, receiving stolen property, and theft of services.

The single most important factor in determining the severity of a Maryland theft charge is the value of the property taken or attempted to be taken.

Maryland Theft Classifications and Penalties

Maryland Theft Penalties — CL §7-104
Value of PropertyClassificationMax ImprisonmentMax Fine
Under $100Misdemeanor (Petty)90 days$500
$100 – $1,499Misdemeanor6 months$500
$1,500 – $24,999Felony5 years$10,000
$25,000 – $99,999Felony10 years$15,000
$100,000 or moreFelony20 years$25,000
Motor vehicle theft (any value)Felony5 years$5,000

Elements the State Must Prove

For a theft conviction, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

The intent element — the specific intent to permanently or substantially deprive the owner of their property — is the most frequently contested element in theft defense. Honest mistake, good faith belief in ownership, and claim of right are all potential defenses that negate the required intent.

Shoplifting in Maryland

Shoplifting falls under the unified theft statute. Under CL §7-104(e), there is a rebuttable presumption of theft when a person conceals unpurchased merchandise while on retail premises. This means a loss prevention officer's observation of concealment, without completed exit from the store, is generally sufficient to establish the presumption — though the defendant can rebut that presumption.

The value of the merchandise determines the classification. Shoplifting charges under $100 are misdemeanors but still result in a criminal record upon conviction. Even "minor" shoplifting charges can have significant employment consequences.

Restitution and Civil Demand

Theft convictions typically result in restitution orders requiring repayment of the value of stolen property. In shoplifting cases, retailers may also send civil demand letters seeking recovery under Maryland's civil shoplifting statute — these are separate from the criminal proceeding. An attorney can advise on how to handle civil demands in the context of your pending criminal case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Shoplifting is a felony in Maryland when the value of the merchandise is $1,500 or more. Under $1,500, it is a misdemeanor. Even misdemeanor shoplifting results in a criminal record upon conviction, with potential consequences for employment, professional licensing, and security clearances. For any theft charge above $1,500, felony consequences including a permanent felony record and significant prison exposure apply.
Expungement eligibility for theft charges depends on the disposition. PBJ dispositions may be eligible for expungement after probation completion. Felony theft convictions generally have extended waiting periods or may be ineligible for expungement depending on the specific charge and the 2025 Expungement Reform Act provisions. Cases that are dismissed or result in acquittal are expungement-eligible. An attorney can advise on the specific eligibility for your case.
Theft in Maryland requires specific intent to deprive the owner of property. An honest mistake, inadvertent taking, or good faith belief in a right to the property can negate the intent element required for conviction. This is a factual issue that depends on the specific circumstances of the alleged taking. An attorney can evaluate whether the intent element can be challenged on the facts of your case.
The Cohen Law Firm · Maryland Criminal Defense

Facing Criminal Charges in Maryland?

A criminal charge can alter the course of your life. Call today for a free, confidential consultation with Attorney Adam Sean Cohen.

Call 410-332-0414 Send a Message